The only student forum endorsed by freeexampapers.com
May 19, 2012, 08:37:45 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Past Papers || Free Textbooks || Tutoring Agency || Coursework || Internet School || Education Directory || Education Channel || Student Shop
 
   Home   Blogs Help Arcade Calendar Login Register StudentWiki  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Should richer nations help poorer ones in their tertiary or secondary sector?  (Read 3465 times)
~Alpha
Administrator
SF V.I.P
*****

Reputation Power: 36117
~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 9952


<-<You will drown>->


WWW
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2011, 03:32:19 am »

Then, that requires a change of mindset, which is indeed, very difficult to bring about. And which perhaps will take a couple of generations to come.

And it requires farmers to reduce work on their fields, their prime source of revenue, given the opportunity cost of time.

Listing what has to be done is easy. But that is only a first step to solving the problem. The real challenge is to find ways of implementing them.
Logged

  Friendship-- define it your way!

My Blog


SF magazine 2012 - Download here
astarmathsandphysics
Administrator
SF Overlord
*****

Reputation Power: 13066
astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10581


Free the exam papers!


WWW
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2011, 10:38:56 pm »

I don't thinkpeople necessarily need to work less in the field. They do need to learn to produce more for the time they work. That is part of the lingo they need to learn.
Logged

~Alpha
Administrator
SF V.I.P
*****

Reputation Power: 36117
~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!~Alpha is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 9952


<-<You will drown>->


WWW
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2011, 01:51:09 am »

Well, you are right about that. But if changing mentality was an easy and timely process (because they also need to keep up with the technological pace), then I don't think countries in the world would be poor, in the absolute sense (because relatively, there definitely will be).
Logged

  Friendship-- define it your way!

My Blog


SF magazine 2012 - Download here
astarmathsandphysics
Administrator
SF Overlord
*****

Reputation Power: 13066
astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!astarmathsandphysics is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10581


Free the exam papers!


WWW
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2011, 09:02:58 pm »

Everybody learns at their own pace. If someone doesnt know what the next step is to make their life better, a lot of the time it is not technology but organisation. When Europeans conquered the world it wasn't cos they had better technology - in many respects it was worse than Chines and Indian technology - but cos they were better organised.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Enotify by CreateAForum.com
Powered by Blog Community 2.0.2 Beta  |  © 2008 Charles Hill
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.167 seconds with 26 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.023s, 2q)